article

the argument of the social security is a continuation of the america's premier socialist program and that americans cant be trusted to take care of themselves or the parents. all the money that people get is put un and spent for no reason. there is no i put in money that is earning interest in some investments funds. most of the social security tax comes from the social security taxpayers. that what makes social security a transfer program instead of a retirement program.

the excess is the amount of collective money you pay. the government takes spends that excess as part of its general welfare state expenditures. so thy named it ious into what its called social security funds. this mean that the federal officials are to promise to pay the social security money back even with interest that they are spending with hesitating.The implicit reason, according to the bureaucrats, is that Americans cannot be trusted to voluntarily help their parents. That is, if Social Security taxes were abolished, children would sooner let their parents die in the streets than voluntarily help them out. Or to put it another way, only bureaucrats, not regular people, can be trusted to help people in need, albeit with money extracted from regular people through the force of the IRS.


Ultimately, the commandment “Honor thy father and thy mother” is addressed to the hearts and minds of individuals. To mean anything in a moral sense, the choice of whether to comply with the commandment must come from the heart and mind of the person. Isn't that what free will is all about? How can morality and compassion and obedience to God be reconciled with majority rule, the IRS, and bureaucratic decision 


The entire Social Security scheme is a lie and a fraud of monumental proportions — and has been since the very beginning. If someone in the private sector tried something like this, he'd be serving a long sentence in a federal penitentiary.